Name and Date – Outline
Army Unity of Command
Command unity代写 Army about the Afghanistan war on terror famous referred to as Operation and ENDURING FREECOM and Anaconda.
Thesis Command unity代写
It is essential to evaluate the meaning and application of unity of command by the U.S. Army about the Afghanistan war on terror famous referred to as Operation and ENDURING FREECOM and Anaconda.
Body Command unity代写
Supporting Topic 1: What is unity of command and how it relates to the case study
Supporting Idea 1: The definition of unity of command in the context of military operations. Unity of command refers to how the army operates under the command and control of a single commander who has the powers and authority to give directions to all forces in a particular purpose.
Supporting Idea 2: How the unity of command relates to the case study. Most applied in the Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and Operation Anaconda.
Supporting Idea 3: Establishment of Joint Force Special Operations Component. JFSOCC offered joint command of the JSOTFs. Command unity代写**格式
Supporting Idea 4: Joint forces operated under joint doctrine. The unity of command is evident from the use of Ground Forward Air Controllers to every force operating in Afghanistan and Air Control Element which was missing in SOF. Also, SOLE and CAOC air command was reinforced in the structure.
Supporting Idea 5: United of command was also applied in operation Anaconda. JFSOCC commander directed TF DAGGER to carry out Anaconda planning which saw much integration of Afghan in the war again terrorists in Shahi Kot valley.
Supporting Topic 2: What issues caused unity of command confusing and how it could have been solved. Command unity代写
Supporting Idea 1: CENTCOM commander failed to establish subordinate unified commands in Afghanistan. CENTCOM assumed command and control of the joint war which was unconventional and faulted the role of JFSOCC.
Supporting Idea 2: CENTCOM faulted the command needed to be used for the joint forces. CENTCOM had made the troops used to its way and hence introducing a different command authority made was challenging. Command unity代写**格式
Supporting Idea 3: The command relationships which existed before Operation Anaconda and those created in OPORD 02-001 made TF DAGGER and TF-BAR to become rigid in adopting another command as saw it retain OPCON of their associated aviation assets.
Supporting Idea 4: The new command different from those used by CENTCOM resulted in an abrupt change in operations different from those which were in use.
Supporting Topic 3: Recommendations Command unity代写
Supporting Idea 1: Realign all U.S. functions under the USEUCOM and empower SACEUR whose lack fractured the operations.
Supporting Idea 2: The capacity building of the Afghan National Army and Afghan Air Corps would have been integrated into the joint operations.
References Command unity代写
Fleri, E., Howard, E., Hukill, J., & Searle, T. R. (2003). Operation Anaconda Case Study. College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, pp. 1-28.
Feickert, A. (2013). The unified command plan and combatant command Background and issues for Congress. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service.
Hope, I. (2008). Unity of Command in Afghanistan: A Forsaken Principle of War. ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA.