Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Research Paper Draft
建筑设计代写 It was also found that building designs have ignored the benefits that come with building staircases for health purpose.
Incidental physical activities are essential for keeping the body fit especially to people who are mostly physically inactive. In this sense, building designs on the stare and elevators have become a concern the healthcare specialists as many people prefer to use elevators instead of climbing stairs which is hurting their healthy living (Van Hoecke et al. p. 530). Stair climbing is recommended as it encourages people to be physically active and hence lose weight. The use of stair instead of elevators is one way of doing exercise which might be missing in one life.
The benefits associated with physical activity include weight control, as a way of combating health conditions and disease, and improves body energy and moods. Besides, physical activity is associated with job performance and another build on social relations. Regarding these benefit, a holistic view of the effect of people’s preference in accessing building is critical to understand the lack of physical exercise and obesity as an emerging issue in healthcare. As such, this research looked into the building designs that position staircases in a more strategic, attractive and elegant way to allow for people to prefer them over elevators which have long-term health impacts.
Research Question 建筑设计代写
The research will seek to answer the following general question and specific questions:
How do the locational design and the speed matter of staircases and elevators in a building affect the level of physical activity in the building?
The specific research questions will include:
i. How the position of staircases affects the preference to elevators?
ii. What stares and elevators designs are most attractive to the people to create preference?
iii. What is the most preferred method ascending to a house and why?
Putting Primary Research to the Social and Academic Context 建筑设计代写
The research concluded that most people prefer to use elevators over the stairs. It was also found that building designs have ignored the benefits that come with building staircases for health purpose. Although elevators brought the convenience of access and building of tall buildings. It too came with the health detriments (Zacharias and Ling p. 696). Regarding this, the primary research focuses on how building design can encourage the use of stairs instead of elevators.
Notably, some building stairs are designed to be unattractive and secluded while making elevators more strategic and convenient. In the elevator-centric buildings, fewer people are using stairs, while in stair-centric buildings, fewer people are using elevators. Therefore, it is a matter of strategic design that determines the preference of one access to the building over the other.
The primary research found that more stair-centric designs encourage the use of stairs. 建筑设计代写
There are both social and health benefits associated with this recommendation. Further, the use of stairs in the building will not only build on the physical activities but also the social aspect of it. According to Islamoglu (p. 230), the design of modern schools has focused on building atrium stairs. That are believed to support socialization as well as provide space for connection. Therefore, the approach used is to design staircases that are attractive to students to use them and as well as encourage socialization while using them.
The same notion of approach is reinforced by Willson and Winebrenner (par. 1) when they depict stairs as the new of focusing on student learning. Therefore, the house design should focus on placing stairs at the focal point in the building. Again, they Willson and Winebrenner (par. 4) emphasized on the elegance and strategic positioning of stairs which will encourage their use for not only physical activities but also for learning and socialization. These studies are in agreement with the findings in the primary research about the positioning and design of stairs and implication to users.
A Canadian Medical Association Journal researched stair and elevator use (Shah et al. p. 1354). 建筑设计代写
They found that stairs not only beneficial to the body but they also save on time compared to riding on the elevator. It is true because when one is waiting for the elevator, the person who chooses to use the stairs will be on their way to the destinations. In addition to their research, they found out that, those who use stairs have higher aerobic capacity than those who decide to use the elevator. Also, a person who uses stairs can build and maintain healthy bones, muscles and joints.
Besides, the use of stairs is not only good for the individuals, but also to the company as the elevators are believed to consume over 100 Watts per hour per round trip of 20 floors per person (Wright par. 7). Therefore, when elevators are ditched, we will be a saving of about 33lbs of the CO2 a month. Not only that, companies will save about 15 minutes of person for taking stairs beside building on their mood and socialization during work.
Therefore, according to the findings and the literature, the consensus is that elevators have been used as a substitution for stairs. While it was an invention that enabled the development of tall buildings, it should not come at the expense of the user health. In this regard, building designers should put more emphasis on being stair-centric to create a preference for the use of stairs. The design should be strategic, elegant and attractive to the users. The increase in the use of stairs will reduce the rate of health complication due to inactivity. Increase job performance and reduce costs that come with the use of elevators.
Work Cited 建筑设计代写
Islamoglu, Özge. “Amphitheater Stairs as Socialization Space in Schools.” The Anthropologist 25.3 (2016): 229-239.
Willson, Adele, and Peter Winebrenner. “Learning Stairs: The New Student-Centered Space — School Planning & Management”. School Planning & Management, 2017, https://webspm.com/articles/2017/11/01/learning-stairs.aspx. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
Shah, Sachin, et al. “Elevators or stairs?.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 183.8 (2011): E1353-E1355.
Van Hoecke, Ann-Sophie, Jan Seghers, and Filip Boen. “Promoting Stair Climbing in a Worksite and Public Setting: Are Footprints Enough?.” American Journal of Health Promotion 32.3 (2018): 527-535.
Wright, Trenton Quinn. “Elevators Vs Stairs Trent Wright | Mathematics For Sustainability: Fall 2017”. Sites.Psu.Edu, 2017, http://sites.psu.edu/math033fa17/2017/10/09/elevators-vs-stairs-trent-wright/. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
Zacharias, John, and Richard Ling. “Choosing between stairs and escalator in shopping centres: the impact of location, height, and pedestrian volume.” Environment and Behavior 47.6 (2015): 694-709.
名称
讲师
课程
日期
研究论文草稿
建筑设计代写还发现，建筑设计忽略了出于健康目的而建造楼梯所带来的好处。
偶然的体育锻炼对于保持身体健康至为重要，尤其是对于那些大部分身体不活跃的人而言。从这个意义上讲，凝视和电梯上的建筑设计已成为医疗保健专家的关注点，因为许多人更喜欢使用电梯而不是爬楼梯，这损害了他们的健康生活（Van Hoecke等人，第530页）。建议爬楼梯，因为它可以鼓励人们进行体育锻炼，从而减轻体重。使用楼梯代替电梯是一种锻炼的方法，这可能是一生中所缺少的。
与体育锻炼有关的好处包括控制体重，这是与健康状况和疾病作斗争的一种方式，并可以改善体力和情绪。此外，体育锻炼与工作绩效有关，是社会关系的另一种基础。关于这些好处，从整体上了解人们在进入建筑物时的偏好影响对于理解缺乏运动和肥胖是医疗保健中的一个新兴问题至关重要。因此，这项研究调查了以更战略，更具吸引力和更优雅的方式对楼梯进行定位的建筑设计，从而使人们更喜欢楼梯，而不会对电梯产生长期的健康影响。
研究问题 建筑设计代写
该研究将寻求回答以下一般性问题和特定问题：
建筑物中楼梯和电梯的位置设计和速度如何如何影响建筑物中的身体活动水平？
具体的研究问题将包括：
一世。楼梯的位置如何影响对电梯的偏爱？
ii。什么样的凝视和电梯设计对人们产生偏好最有吸引力？
iii。登上房屋的最佳方法是什么？为什么？
将基础研究融入社会和学术环境
研究得出的结论是，大多数人更喜欢在楼梯上使用电梯。还发现，建筑设计忽略了出于健康目的而建造楼梯所带来的好处。虽然电梯带来了进出和建造高层建筑物的便利。它也伴随着对健康的损害（Zacharias and Ling p。696）。关于这一点，主要研究集中在建筑设计如何鼓励使用楼梯代替电梯上。
值得注意的是，一些建筑楼梯被设计为不吸引人且隐蔽的，同时使电梯更具战略性和便利性。在以电梯为中心的建筑物中，使用楼梯的人数减少，而在以楼梯为中心的建筑物中，使用电梯的人数减少。因此，战略性设计决定了一个建筑物进入另一个建筑物的优先权。
初步研究发现，以楼梯为中心的设计鼓励使用楼梯。建筑设计代写
此建议具有社会和健康益处。此外，在建筑物中使用楼梯不仅将建立在体育活动上，而且还将建立在社会活动的基础上。根据Islamoglu（p。230），现代学校的设计重点是建造中庭楼梯。相信这将支持社会化并提供联系的空间。因此，所采用的方法是设计对学生有吸引力的楼梯，并鼓励他们在使用时进行社交。
Willson和Winebrenner（第1段）在将楼梯描述为关注学生学习的新内容时，强化了相同的方法概念。因此，房屋设计应着重于在建筑物的焦点处放置楼梯。他们再次将Willson和Winebrenner（第4段）重点放在楼梯的优雅和战略位置上，这将鼓励楼梯不仅用于体育活动，而且也用于学习和社交。这些研究与关于楼梯的位置和设计及其对用户的影响的基础研究中的发现是一致的。
《加拿大医学会杂志》研究了楼梯和电梯的使用（Shah等人，第1354页）。建筑设计代写
他们发现，与乘坐电梯相比，楼梯不仅有益于身体，而且还节省了时间。的确如此，因为当人们在等电梯时，选择使用楼梯的人将在前往目的地的路上。除了他们的研究，他们发现，使用楼梯的人比决定使用电梯的人有氧能力更高。另外，使用楼梯的人可以构建和维护健康的骨骼，肌肉和关节。
此外，使用楼梯不仅对个人有益，而且对公司也有利，因为据认为，电梯每人每20层的往返行程每小时消耗100瓦以上的功率（Wright参数7）。因此，抛弃电梯后，我们每月将节省约33磅的二氧化碳。不仅如此，公司还将在工作中建立自己的情绪和社交能力的同时，节省大约15分钟的上楼梯时间。
因此，根据调查结果和文献，共识是电梯已被用作楼梯的替代品。虽然这项发明可以发展高层建筑，但不应以牺牲使用者健康为代价。在这方面，建筑设计师应更加注重以楼梯为中心，以偏爱使用楼梯。设计应具有战略性，优雅且对用户具有吸引力。由于不运动，增加楼梯的使用将降低健康并发症的发生率。使用电梯可以提高工作绩效并降低成本。
Work Cited 建筑设计代写
Islamoglu, Özge. “Amphitheater Stairs as Socialization Space in Schools.” The Anthropologist 25.3 (2016): 229-239.
Willson, Adele, and Peter Winebrenner. “Learning Stairs: The New Student-Centered Space — School Planning & Management”. School Planning & Management, 2017, https://webspm.com/articles/2017/11/01/learning-stairs.aspx. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
Shah, Sachin, et al. “Elevators or stairs?.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 183.8 (2011): E1353-E1355.
Van Hoecke, Ann-Sophie, Jan Seghers, and Filip Boen. “Promoting Stair Climbing in a Worksite and Public Setting: Are Footprints Enough?.” American Journal of Health Promotion 32.3 (2018): 527-535.
Wright, Trenton Quinn. “Elevators Vs Stairs Trent Wright | Mathematics For Sustainability: Fall 2017”. Sites.Psu.Edu, 2017, http://sites.psu.edu/math033fa17/2017/10/09/elevators-vs-stairs-trent-wright/. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
Zacharias, John, and Richard Ling. “Choosing between stairs and escalator in shopping centres: the impact of location, height, and pedestrian volume.” Environment and Behavior 47.6 (2015): 694-709.
